How complementarians make little man-gods. Part 4

In Genesis 3:4, Satan tempted Eve with the fruit by telling her that God knew that their eyes would be opened and they would be like God, knowing good and evil. God was the ultimate being, there was none like God.

Eve, desiring wisdom, took the fruit and ate it. Then she gave it to Adam and he also ate the fruit from the tree of knowledge, and now both Eve and Adam knew good and evil. They were banished from the garden with the new clothes on their backs that God made for them.

Then God said that these human beings had become like God in that they now knew good and evil. (Genesis 3:21-22 NIV), The Lord God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them. And the Lord God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.”

As they left the garden, there was no leadership involved. Neither Eve nor Adam was deemed to have leadership over the other.  Now they both had knowledge of good and evil, making them individually capable of doing what is good, or choosing to do what is evil. They were equal. They were equal from the beginning and they were equal after the sinning. God said so.

God is not evil, but these humans were not God, and the knowledge of right and wrong would often cause man to choose that which is wrong. We see it in God’s words, “He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.”

Mankind has the desire for eternal life. We want to go to heaven, we want to be saved, and we want to be with God. We believe that God wants that for us also, so much so that he sent His Son Jesus to make that possible, “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:15).

We believe that eternal life comes from God, and not from human males. We desire eternal life, but it is not ours to give or to withhold, even for ourselves.

Man has often desired to have more spiritual authority than God gave mankind. Look at Jesus’ disciples. We are told in Matthew, Mark, and Luke that James and John came to Jesus asking to sit one on each side of Jesus when Jesus came into his kingdom. Jesus told them flatly that they did not belong there. No man is divine and human man cannot be in that place. Yet men want that position and they have claimed it, by a misinterpretation of the scriptures. They have gone further than to claim it. They have chosen to teach that husbands represent Christ (the savior) in a marriage, while giving the part of the church (the lesser, the one that needs to be saved) to wives.

Women do not want to be greater in the kingdom today than males, and women did not want it back then. Women never asked Jesus for any honor to be bestowed upon them, unlike his Disciples James and John who did ask for such an honor. Women do not claim superiority over males, nor do women desire to be males. Women just claim equality.

But look back at what God said about man. God said that man would reach out and take it. Just what God said would happen, is happening. Males are stretching forth their hands, and some are claiming that males hold the power of everlasting life, and that women must denounce their desire to be males (man-gods) in order to obtain that everlasting life for themselves. In this way, they believe that human males become our gateway to God.

To become a gateway to God means that you are directly connected to God but those who enter the gateway must enter through you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

How complementarians make little man-gods. Part 3

If someone told you that human males are born to be gods, you would brand that person as a heretic, or perhaps a Mormon. (Last week, my Mormon hairdresser actually told me he was God in his family) Yet that is what is being taught by some professors in Southern Baptist (SBC) affiliated seminaries. Any pastor or seminary that uses Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism as their guide teaches this.

This misogynous book was published in 1991 and was, and still is, sponsored by the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood. It continues to be a best-seller. The 482 page book is a collection of male headship writings and teachings of various Christians. John Piper and Wayne Grudem edited this book and it is therefore assumed that they agree with its teachings, for why would anybody put something in a book that they do not agree with? And why would anyone use such a book unless they, too, believe it?

In this post, we will use their own words to see how they express this belief that men are gods, and that women are inferior to these human male gods. In order to elevate themselves, they must first oppress females. They do that with their claim that women want to be men. This is evidenced all through their Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood book. Others have taken up their mantra that women want to be men, as we can see in the email I received.

I don’t even know where to begin! By saying the things you say, you are instantly breaking Gods commands for women. How can you, a poor sinner, decide what the scripture means? It’s very simple if you read the words that are written, and not what you WANT to think it says. God’s words are non-negotiable and are to be lived every single day. I know we all sin, but by saying that His words/commands are WRONG…I can only pray you will see the true word of God and repent. Women are NOT equal to men, or they would BE men. You are mad at God because he did not make you a man (a comment on my blog).

For some time I have been struggling with the teaching that God chose males to be rulers over women. I could not understand how any Christian group or pastor can teach that women can give birth to a boy-child who they believe is inherently greater than the mother is. But I had a problem with this because every time I would think, “A woman cannot give birth to a being superior to herself,” I would come up with Mary who gave birth to Jesus, who was the son of God.

Yes, she could do it, but that is the exception and women cannot give birth to a greater being than she herself, can she? A human boy baby is believed by complementarians to have spiritual leadership imbued within his being, simply because he was born male.

You will be surprised as I was to learn that complementarians are actually teaching that women – you and I – are giving birth to god-men on earth. These little boy-babies we birth are divine because how else can a baby become divine except by birth? Little girl babies are not thought to be divine, nor in the line-up with God, the Son, the Holy Spirit, Husbands.

Adam, who was in God’s image, passed the divine image (albeit flawed by sin) on to his son Seth. The divine image resided in the individuals Adam and Seth. (MALE-FEMALE EQUALITY AND MALE HEADSHIP GENESIS 1-3 by Raymond C. Ortlund, Jr., page 89 of Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood).

Here we have Adam passing along his divinity through his seed to a son, Seth. According to complementarians, a woman in the image of God reflects an incomplete image, as she does not have spiritual or physical leadership over others.

We can see Ortlund’s reasoning in one of two ways: 1) Only Seth had the divine image and the other sons of Adam did not, and divinity would have been lost; or he meant 2) Adam passed his divine image to Seth and then to all his sons (which is the way you must see it in order for males to have headship over females).

According to Ortlund, as each male had sons, those sons became imbued with divinity. Thus they became little man-gods, which they teach is still being passed on through to sons in the 21st Century. Ortlund does not say that divinity was passed on through daughters, even though he does claim that men and women are both in the image of God. Was not Eve, too, in God’s image and wouldn’t Eve have passed that divinity to her sons and daughters, if divinity could be passed through humans? We are in the 21st century here, but down through the ages, people have thought that kings and emperors, and other leaders, had divinity on earth. It startles us when we realize our own pastors are teaching this.

Genesis 5:1 says “…When God created man, he made him in the likeness of God. He created them male and female and blessed them. And when they were created, he called them ‘man.'” That scripture goes on to say that that Adam had a son in his likeness, in his own image, so this is apparently where Ortlund feels he can exclude women. But then the statement is made that Adam had other sons and daughters and no mention is made of those sons having the divine image, so Ortlund is choosing to see what he wants to see in order to confirm his beliefs.

Instead of Desiring God, as John Piper and Wayne Grudem would have you believe through their premier misogynistic work, these seminary professors, pastors, preachers, Christian leaders, and Piper and Grudem themselves, are Desiring to BE God.

There is only one God in heaven, so they cannot all be God, but they teach that all men have the potential to be man-gods on earth.

www.shirleytaylor.net

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

How complementarians make little man-gods. Part 2

Jesus makes no mention of bequeathing a husband the privilege of representing him on earth, nor does Jesus make any mention that a woman’s salvation would be dependent upon anyone other than Jesus Himself. Jesus promised that he would leave an Advocate, the Holy Spirit, on earth to lead us. With the Holy Spirit within us, women need no further representation, or role play actor, or leader, and certainly not a male head. For what leadership can a male head give that the Holy Spirit cannot?

“All this I have spoken while still with you. But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you. Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid,” John 14:26-27.

These words were spoken specifically to Jesus’ disciples, but all Christians have believed these words apply to those of us who are Christians, men and women alike. We believe Holy Spirit was made known equally to both men and women at Pentecost (Acts 2:17-24).

Before Jesus began his ministry on earth, John the Baptist was to prepare the way. Luke tells us that the angel of the Lord told Zechariah that his son, whom we know as John the Baptist, would be like the prophet Elijah, “And he will go on before the Lord, in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to their children and the disobedient to the wisdom of the righteous – to make ready a people prepared for the Lord,” (Luke 1:17). Jesus says of John the Baptist in Matthew 11:14, “And if you are willing to accept it, he is the Elijah who was to come.” Jesus was referring to Malachi 4:5-6, “See I will send you the prophet Elijah before that great and dreadful day of the Lord comes. He will turn the hearts of the fathers to their children, and the hearts of the children to their fathers; or else I will come and strike the land with a curse.”

There was no Elijah moment when husbands were commissioned for service, or were charged with the protection of their wives, and no Elijah moment when husbands were given the ability for sanctification of their wives to create a covenant relationship with God (1 Kings 19:16-19). More importantly, there was no Pentecost moment when husbands became the head of Christian women.

Yet, that is what it has come to in many religious circles, particularly in seminaries, and among pastors and others who believe that women are to be submissive to their husbands (some even believe that husbands will account for their wives in heaven). These complementarians believe and teach that husbands represent Christ and that wives represent the church. Therefore, to complementarians, husbands become the provider, the protector and the sanctifier to lead their wives into a covenant relationship with God.

Stay with me because this next post is going to get really crazy, and it would be funny if it wasn’t what they actually teach and believe. These are Christian seminary professors and leaders in the Christian faith and should know better.

www.shirleytaylor.net

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How complementarians make little man-gods. Part 1

Desiring to be God, complementarian religious men have made themselves a woman’s savior, her advocate, and the gateway to God. In next few posts, you will see how male religious leaders have made themselves into man-gods, and how they want to convince all men that they, too, are man-gods.

Christians, Jews and Muslims believe in one God. Although we see God through different lenses, and we call God by different names, we worship the same God. Most, but not all, Christians believe that God is Triune, meaning that God is in three persons: Father, Son (Jesus), and Holy Spirit.

The Triune God causes problems as some see Christians as actually trying to divide God into three separate Gods. Christians have problems with this also, often emphasizing one over the other. Some Christians buy into the belief that Jesus is eternally submissive to God, instead of being fully God. This is called the Eternal Son Submission theology and is used as the basis for claiming that women are eternally submissive to males. Those who teach and believe that women are to be submissive to husbands because this is a commandment from God for all women through the ages, are in practice subscribing to this Eternal Son Submission theology. Because of this teaching, these Christians are in danger of adding another god to the Trinity, and this time it is a little man-god called “husband.”

Now, understand, they do not say that, and they would deny it from the rooftops. But they quote certain scriptures from the Bible and hold women to the literal interpretation of those scriptures, and when they do that, a husband becomes a little man-god.

A quick note to explain egalitarian versus complementarian: Egalitarians believe that men and women are equal. Complementarians believe they are not. I am egalitarian. The word egalitarian will not be used in this series, but the word complementarian will be sprinkled all through because this series is about their unbiblical teaching that males are superior to females, both spiritually and physically.

This is how it works. Complementarians teach that husbands, or males, are to have headship, also called leadership, over women. In order for males to have headship over women, Jesus Christ would have to share his Lordship with human men. If Jesus shared his Lordship with a man – married or not – that man would become an earthly god. Whenever anyone believes that men are to have headship over women, they are subscribing to a belief that is contrary to our Christian faith, which is one God.

There is no indication in the Old Testament from the Prophets, or in the Gospels, that the Messiah would share his Lordship with human males on earth.

Women have told me that they believe that the husband is the head of the wife like Christ is the head of the church. They are quoting Paul in Ephesians, but to believe this way, you must accept that Jesus is sharing his Lordship with a human man. It is more probable that Paul meant for the Ephesians to look at their own families where husbands were already the heads, and then think of Jesus as being the head of his church family. But that is not the way complementarians want you to interpret that scripture.

www.shirleytaylor.net
amazon.com/author/taylorshirley
The Power of a Book: The Street Evangelist
Raising the Hood: A Christian Look at Manhood and Womanhood
Women Equal – No Buts: Powered by the same Source
Dethroning Male Headship: 2nd Edition
How complementarians make little man-gods. Part 2

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Here we go again

Don’t they ever get tired of arguing about women and gays?

The Vatican begins its “Synod on Synodality” next week on October 4, where they will discuss – you guessed it – women and gays. The word Synodality means listening together to see how God is dealing with individuals. Call me cynical, but it is likely a session to listen together to hear what they already believe.

They will abide by their 1976 declaration on the ordination of women. The Vatican even says so when they declare that discussion of doctrine is off the table “Changes in doctrine and morality are off the table, according to Vatican officials.”

But this blog is not to just beat up on the Catholics. We will also beat up on SBC and CBMW because they LOVE to discuss women and gays.

Because of the loud clamor of dissenting voices, in 2016, both Catholics and Southern Baptists put together a commission or an advisory council to study the matter of women in church leadership. But do not expect anything to come of either one, because the outcome has already been decided before any meeting ever takes place.

It will not be these Christian leaders that pave the way for women. It will be ordinary people taking a stand and speaking up. The Southern Baptist Convention and the Vatican can save their money and their time. They both know what conclusion they will reach.

Let’s take a look at the picture regarding Christian women as it stands now (in 2016 when I wrote this)

Pope Francis institutes the Commission for the Study of the Diaconate of Women

On the now famous plane trip July 29, 2013, Pope Francis, when asked about women’s ordination, said “That door is closed.” Women must remember that it was Pope Benedict who closed that door in 2010 by saying that pedophilia crime is on the same level as having a woman as a preacher.

On May 12, 2016, Pope Francis was asked again to address the call for Catholic women to be allowed to serve as deacons. There is a specific distinction between deacons and priests. Deacons can preach, perform marriages, lead funeral services and run parishes. They can be married men but they must have been married before they became deacons. They cannot hear confessions or consecrate the Eucharist. As of yet, Catholic deacons cannot be women. Currently there are about 18,000 Catholic deacons in the United States, all males.

Pope Francis’ answer was that he would think about appointing a study. The news sources picked it up and declared that the Pope had opened the gate for ordaining Catholic women as deaconesses.

Two months later, Pope Francis established an official commission that could study the question “of the diaconate of women, especially with regard to the first ages of the Church,” the Vatican’s statement said.

The commission’s purpose falls short of what Pope Francis was originally asked to do. This commission is not charged with studying the possibility of women deaconesses in the 21st century; instead, this commission is to look at the history of early day deacons and deaconesses and the Church’s tradition. Hardly an open door for women today.

Plus, this is the third time such a commission has been appointed, and neither time has it gone anywhere.

It is safe to say that this commission will also die on the vine.

Women’s roles in Southern Baptist Convention focus of advisory council

Southern Baptist women have also stood up and asked for a place at the table.

Not to be outdone by the Catholics, a few weeks after Catholic women appealed to Pope Francis in May, on June 16, 2016, Southern Baptists formed an Advisory Council5 to “study the perspectives and strategies women in Southern Baptist churches bring to the God-given task of fulfilling the Great Commission.”

They made no pretense about entertaining the idea that women could be deacons or pastors. That is not even on the table. What is on the table is the fact that they felt the need to praise women for their contributions, hoping they would be satisfied with that.

This Advisory Council is made up of 18 women. Three of the women are wives of Southern Baptist seminary presidents: Mrs. Al Mohler, Mrs. Chuck Kelley, and Mrs. Jeff Iorg. These women prefer to be known as ‘the wife of’ before any other professional accomplishments are listed.

Since Southern Baptists believe that wives are to submit graciously to their husbands, and that Baptist women cannot be deacons or pastors, or even lead men in the church or home, there is no way these women will come to any conclusion that their husbands do not agree with. In fact, that is what male headship means: he makes the rules and she cannot decide against him. It would be heresy if a SBC seminary wife spoke in direct opposition to their faith statements as posted to their websites. Make no mistake: if any of those 18 women said that women should be allowed to be deacon or preachers, she and her husband would face harsh criticism.

The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood seeks a more dominant voice

While the Catholics are studying the historical role of women deaconesses and the SBC is congratulating themselves on allowing women any position at all, the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood has recently taken a hard-line step toward keeping women in their place.

Their new president, Denny Burk, is calling on all Christians to get in line behind the Danvers Statement by signing up more Christian groups to endorse it. Burk’s “My vision for the future of CBMW” spells it out.

Burk wants to renew this war against women with “resources, conferences, etc. in order to equip churches and organizations to face these current challenges.” They already have those resources plus they have locked egalitarian (women’s equality) books from being sold in Christian bookstores. What more do they want? Witch hunts come to mind.

Burk also wants to spread the net further and encompass all gender and sexual identities. It is important to remember that even if you have strongly held objections against homosexuals and transgendered people, it is never right to embark on a crusade against your fellow man. Look at the harm of the Crusades, the Inquisition, slavery, women’s rights, and the damage already done to homosexuals down through the years. Christians should never be complicit in exacting damage to those we disagree with or see as less than ourselves.

You are the deciding factor

Baptists and Catholics have long been on the wrong side of justice. Among them are the witch-hunts during the Inquisition, slavery in the United States, women’s right to vote, and criminalizing homosexuality.

Southern Baptists, Roman Catholics, and the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood have outlined their positions in 2016. We know the conclusion they will reach because we know what defines them. They are all bound by church tradition and recent statements of faith such as the Baptist Faith and Message 2000 and the Danvers Statement of 1987. They cannot act outside their man-made restrictions.

What they do not know – and what they have no control over – is how you will react.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The question women never asked Jesus

Let’s see what Jesus had to say about marriage. Did you know that it was always men who asked Jesus about marriage and divorce? From their questions, it seems that they were not interested in learning how to improve their marriages. Women never asked Jesus about marriage or divorce.

Look at Mark 10:2, Some Pharisees came and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?” Jesus answered them by saying that Moses permitted divorce because of the hardness of their hearts. He also said that they completely misunderstood marriage. Jesus said that marriage was to be between a man and his wife. The husband would leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two would become one flesh. It appeared that these men were more interested in getting out of a marriage than in keeping a marriage.

Then Jesus walked away and went into a house as if the conversation was over.

But his disciples were interested this time. They wanted to hear the rest of the story. So they asked him about it.

You can almost hear Jesus sigh. You can almost see him shake his head. Because what he is going to say is not what they want to hear. Remember it was men who were asking about divorce.

Jesus told them that if any man divorced his wife and married another woman, that he commits adultery against his first wife. Jesus put the blame on the man. He blamed him because of his sin and because he caused his wife to sin. Then Jesus brings in equality. He says that, “you men think you are the only ones who can divorce your spouse. But I tell you that the woman can divorce you, and if she does, and if she married another man, she commits adultery.” Against who? Against her first husband, just as the man commits adultery against his first wife.

Equality. What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

I love this passage even though it is difficult. It appears to be very hard against divorce, but it is actually hard against those who seek to rid themselves of their spouses. I believe that divorce is the only solution for many marriages. There are a bunch of men that I would have divorced if I had been unfortunate enough to marry them, and I am sure they would say likewise.

What I like is that Jesus tells men that woman can divorce them, too, and cause them to commit adultery. Women who divorce their husbands make them guilty of adultery, just like women themselves have been made guilty of adultery by their husbands. Now that is a new wrinkle! They had never considered that they, if they happened to be innocent, could be tagged with adultery. I do not know how these men could commit adultery when their law already allowed polygamy. There is a lot of mystery here in this scripture. I do not understand everything, or maybe I don’t even understand very much about it. But this is one of my favorite Scriptures on Equality spoken by Jesus.

Women never asked about marriage and divorce, but Jesus gave women equality in it anyway. If you think your church should do the same, tell them so.

Posted in Jesus and women, Male Headship fallacy, Marriage, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A Look at the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood

The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood continues in their great evil against women. They are selling men a bill of goods that they cannot deliver. In the final day, when God has his say, man will find himself stripped of what he thought was his male headship. Consider who is Head in Heaven. It is not human man, because for a man to be Head in Heaven, that would mean that he had divinity on earth. Who among you will say that males are created to share God’s Lordship?

The Council for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood’s office is located in Louisville, Kentucky. Supporters include all of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminaries (they teach the preachers). The group’s core beliefs are detailed in the Danvers Statement, drafted by evangelical leaders in Danvers, Massachusetts, in 1987, and other religious entities.

We cry out for justice for all those who have suffered, directly and indirectly.

At a time in our church history that the main focus should be on winning lost souls and spreading the gospel to a hurting world, we fear for the future because the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood has placed a greater priority on women’s submissive role rather than on the gospel of Jesus Christ.

I urge the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood to read the story Nathan told to David, and understand that justice will come. It is my desire that the Council repent of its destructive teachings before that great day of reckoning, because they have sacrificed God’s female lambs in order to have their own desires fulfilled.

1 Samuel 2:1-5 The Lord sent Nathan to David. When he came to him, he said, “There were two men in a certain town, one rich and the other poor. The rich man had a very large number of sheep and cattle, but the poor man had nothing except one little ewe lamb he had bought. He raised it, and it grew up with him and his children. It shared his food, drank from his cup and even slept in his arms. It was like a daughter to him.

“Now a traveler came to the rich man, but the rich man refrained from taking one of his own sheep or cattle to prepare a meal for the traveler who had come to him. Instead, he took the ewe lamb that belonged to the poor man and prepared it for the one who had come to him.”

David burned with anger against the man and said to Nathan, “As surely as the Lord lives, the man who did this must die! He must pay for that lamb four times over, because he did such a thing and had no pity.”

Then Nathan said to David, “You are the man!” 

And to help them before that time of reckoning, we demand that they apologize for their teaching that denigrates God’s cherished female children.

For the sake of all Christians of all genders, we demand that CBMW apologize publicly for their misuse of Holy Scripture, and for the inestimable harm suffered by women and families.

Christians have a message to tell the world, and it is time that we do it. Over 800 years ago, Christians decided to force Christianity upon people by the sword. Then Christian pastors tried hellfire and damnation. None of those worked. Somewhere along the line Jesus was lost, and it is up to this generation to find Him.

Every day I speak against injustice toward women. The root of all these religious attacks is how women are viewed. When a nation and a people and a religion believe they are in control of over one-half of the world, that superiority extends to anybody else they choose. It gives license. That license to discriminate against women is found in churches, in mosques, in temples, and on the street. Christians need to examine their hearts and accept complete equality for women in churches and in their own homes. The concept of male headship has no place in Christianity.

If American churches would lead the way, change would happen. As it is, the majority of religions in the United States today will not allow women full equality. Until we do, we give license. We cannot say that we are different until we resolve our feelings about male headship, in light of the actions and teachings of Christ.

The reality is that most Christians will not condemn this teaching against women because, they, too, believe it and teach it. However, they are still leaving Jesus out of Christianity. Jesus is our standard, and since Jesus did not commit women to husbands, or to males, and because Jesus did not deny women anything based on their being women, then we cannot in good stewardship of the gospel, do so either.

When we are willing to withhold the complete God from women (which we do when we deny that women can serve God in every capacity), that is hate. It is also obstructing the message of Christ.

Will you speak up for women? Will you determine that people will know that we are different?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Biblical manhood and womanhood

I am tired of being a ‘hood.” Childhood means that you haven’t grown up yet and not as much is expected of you as it will be when you reach adulthood. Adulthood means that you have reached that age when you ought to know better, and you will be held accountable for your actions. Those are fairly simple.

I am so tired of Manhood and Womanhood.

Manhood sounds sexual. In fact, I will probably get some quirky people reading this because of the use of that word. Maybe it is a sexy word. Maybe that is the reason that the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood chose it. Maybe they wanted to show their machismo.

Now that is a good word. Let’s change the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood to the Council on Biblical Machismo. That is all that is needed – CBM – and that is all they want anyway. You can drop the word ‘Womanhood’ when you make this change. The word ‘womanhood’ just means being a woman, and we all know what that means.

But Machismo. Now that is a word!

It means “a strong or exaggerated sense of manliness; an assumptive attitude that virility, courage, strength, and entitlement to dominate are attributes or concomitants of masculinity.”

Isn’t that the definition of ‘manhood,” also? Entitlement – how God created man to live.

Read the excellent article by Michelle A Gonzales, “Breaking the Habits of Machismo:”

“Some churches calling themselves Christian continue to act as if women are second-class citizens in the kingdom of God – despite what the Bible says.”

I am tired of being a hood. If you are tired of being labeled a hood, speak up!

We have raised the hood on so-called biblical manhood
and womanhood.  Join us!

Available on Amazon in print and on Kindle.

Amazon.com/author/taylorshirley

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The church and homosexuality

I am going to jump right in and talk about the elephant in the room—homosexuality. I just read this article by Dr. Al Mohler Jr “The train is leaving the station, Andy Stanley’s departure from Biblical Christianity.” In this article, he blasts Rev. Andy Stanley’s decision to welcome LGBTQ+ Christians into his church. Mohler, of course, is horrified and tries to justify his horrification by scripture.

Dr. Mohler, the beef you have is not with homosexuals. You already have LGBTQ+ in your church. What you are really afraid of is that when Christians open their hearts to homosexuals, it will cause them to also open their hearts to women preachers.

The Apostle Paul did not say, “I do not permit a woman to speak, because if she does, your next pastor will be a lesbian.” But he may as well have said that, according to the irrational fears pastors have presented to congregations.

Years ago, I heard about subliminal messages in magazines and advertisements. In fact, a review of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies shows that subliminal stimuli activate specific regions of the brain despite participants being unaware (Wikipedia).  So, yes, I am sure that messages get across to our brains without us consciously being aware of it. That is what has happened with women’s equality being equated with homosexuality.

They want us to connect the two and we do.

They cannot, and will not, tolerate women preachers. So Fundamentalists tell us that churches will be full of homosexuals if they allow women as pastors. They lead us to believe that any woman who feels called to preach is a homosexual. They tell us that when a woman wants to pastor a church it is because she wants to be “a man.” So with that unfounded reasoning, they tell us that both the pulpits and the pews will be filled up with homosexuals if women are allowed to preach. Fundamentalists have bound equality to homosexuality, and perhaps the majority has bought into it as well.

There are a handful of religious denominations that accept women as equals, but, ultimately, they have become the stumbling block against women pastors instead of being the standard. The reason is that these churches that have accepted women as pastors have also recognized that within their congregations there likely are homosexuals.

Fundamentalists have engaged in a rock-throwing battle against homosexuals. They spread emails, facebook posts, and promote any and every pastor who has a bad word to say against homosexuals.

Personally, I have never encountered a homosexual woman pastor. But I have heard of, met, and encountered male pastors who are homosexuals, adulterers, pedophiles, wife beaters, murderers, abusers, and sexual deviants. No church will say that because some men are guilty of these things, we should deny all men from service in the church. But that is what they say about women pastors—that some might be homosexuals, so no woman can be a pastor.

A rational person will tell you that the Bible shows absolutely no connection between women and homosexuality, whether they are being allowed to serve God fully in the church or not. However, those who oppose equality will tell you that they do not want a woman preacher, because churches that have women preachers have opened their hearts to accept homosexuality.

But look at the Catholic Church. They do not accept women as priests, and yet we have been made aware that there are numerous priests who are homosexual and many others are pedophiles. What is the connection there? They officially do not accept homosexuality, however, they are beset by male homosexual priests and priest child molesters. The natural conclusion is that if the Catholic Church accepted women as priests, they would have fewer homosexuals and child molesters.

There is no connection between homosexuality and women pastors, but subliminally we think that if we accept women pastors, we will officially endorse homosexuality. That doesn’t make sense. It is not scriptural. But let’s go on with the comparison with evangelicals and Catholics.

Is it just Protestant denominations that accept women as pastors that will have some pastors who are lesbians? Why does that reasoning apply only to women? Why wouldn’t the same reasoning apply to men and make it a possibility that some of our male pastors would be homosexuals. In other words, if you allow women to preach, and it opens the doors to women homosexual preachers, wouldn’t it stand to reason that because we allow men to preach, it would also open the door to male homosexual preachers?

They cannot make that connection, because if they did, there would be NO pastors.

The subliminal message is that once we open our hearts to women pastors, we will also open our hearts to homosexuality. And that is the whole crux of the matter. They believe that we cannot open our hearts to homosexuals.

“Hate the sin, but love the sinner” applies only to homosexuals. The word that enters our brain first is hate. We actually hate the sinner. We forbid women to preach by tagging women with homosexuality, we wage wars against homosexuals, we send out emails, we tell them they are going to hell, and in all ways show a hateful attitude. The love part of that little ditty gets lost.

You can thank the Southern Baptist Convention for propagating the connection with women pastors and homosexuality. In order to purify the Southern Baptist Convention of homosexuals and women pastors, they set about disfellowshipping churches because they were impure according to the gospel of the SBC. The only churches they disfellowship are churches they believe are soft on homosexuality and/or have women pastors. They do not disfellowship churches where a male pastor has been found to be homosexual, or an adulterer, or a pedophile.

Women’s place in early church days was based on the fact that they were women, and was not linked in any way to homosexuality.

With fundamentalists and complementarians so strong against women these days, I predict that the rights of gays and lesbians will be recognized in the churches long before the rights of women and will be the catalyst that finally gives women equality in the church and home. Same-sex marriages will become common, as the Supreme Court made it legal for same-sex men and women to marry on June 26, 2015. The people in the pews will begin to accept homosexuality (like they are doing now with black/white marriages). Once homosexuality is accepted, fundamental churches will have no legs to stand on, and women pastors and deacons will finally be accepted.

I am not advocating for or against homosexuality. My advocacy is for Christian women’s equality. I am just saying that the real message here is just the opposite of what we are being told. The real message is that once we open our hearts to homosexuals, we will also open our hearts to women pastors—not the other way around.

Do you know why we will not be successful before then? We will not win because we are not hungry enough. We do not fight for it. Oh, we discuss it. But we are not hungry enough. We do not fight for equality. Our female forebears fought for equality, but we do not have a clue, or the courage, to fight this injustice in churches.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

All in God’s name

“’Gender apartheid’ in Afghanistan getting out of hand” by the Washington Post was the guest editorial in my local paper Friday, September 8, 2023. They said, “An August 30 report from the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom says that the majority of the 100 religious edicts issued by the de facto government since August 30 directly enforce severe restrictions on women and girls.” Now girls are flogged for leaving their house and going to school.

Before you shake your head at this and wonder how they can do it, I will tell you. Their religion tells them so. Just as most Christian religions today tell women they are to submit. Just as The Gospel Coalition tells women they must submit; just as the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood tells women they must submit; just as the Keller Center tells women they must submit; just as the Southern Baptist Convention tells women they must submit; just as many churches, institutions, seminaries, books, podcasts, blogs tell women they must submit.

The Bible tells men and women they are to submit to each other. That means no little-gods in control.

Let me tell what happened to me so you can see this in practice. I have told this story before.

This is what I wrote in 2016 and it is as true today as it was then.

If she had worn a scarf on her head, I would have expected the words that came out of her mouth. But she was a Christian, young and beautiful, working in a Christian bookstore.

I had stopped by a few months previous and left my book Dethroning Male Headship: Second Edition for them to sell and take the proceeds. I wasn’t asking anything from the sale. So I stopped by to see if the book had sold. Of course I knew they would not even attempt to sell my book, or even read it. Which is exactly what the young woman admitted to.

She said she could not get past the first few pages. I can see why. The first few pages explain the vast difference between egalitarian and complementarian beliefs. The complementarian view is so ingrained in her young life that she could not in good conscience even read that she might be wrong.

I suspect my book appeared as the serpent in the Garden of Eden to her. Unlike Eve, she would not be tempted.

You are either equal or you are not. She had chosen to believe that she was not. She had also chosen to believe that the Bible says so.

I was amazed and astounded at the conversation. I could not believe that young women are so willing to swallow complementarianism and its full expression of female submission to all males.

She quoted Timothy and Titus and said that women are to be the housekeepers. I pointed out that she was working, and she said that women could work but still were to be the housekeepers. Then she said that women were not to have careers. I asked her “what is a career?” I have been a secretary for over 35 years and she is working in a bookstore. Are those careers? She said that a career was where you could “climb the ladder” to a higher job. I laughed and told her that I suppose both she and I could climb the ladder. She could aspire to own the bookstore where she worked, and I could have been (it’s a little late for that now) like Carly Fiorina who began as a secretary and was a presidential candidate in 2016.

Where is this young woman going? She has been told that she cannot have a career (and who decides what a career is?) and she has been told that all males are superior to her. Even though she is still single, she has been led to believe that her husband will support her because the Bible says men are to provide the bread for the family. She has been led to believe that she can work outside the home if she has to, but that in doing so, she is working outside the will of God.

She said “God created sex” which will make this young woman inclined to believe anything she reads by Timothy Keller (a section called “Glory of Sex” – in his book Real Marriage of which they have two copies in their bookstore), Mark Driscoll, Ed Young, Jr., (Fifty Shades of They), and a myriad of other sex preachers. She will believe Beth Moore when she says that women tempt men today like the devil tempted Eve (When godly people do ungodly things), which was the way of thinking that began the witch hunts and resulted in women being burned as witches because “women listen to the devil.”

The serpent said “you will be like God” and now it is men who have chosen to be like God, and they teach that all females are to bow down in submission before all males. Jesus does not teach that God has given males the right to have females bow down before them.

Complementarians never quote Jesus when pushing their theology. Paige Patterson and his wife Dorothy Patterson, John Piper, Wayne Grudem, Mary Kassain, and all others who began this complementarian indoctrination of our young men and women in church, and those who continue to teach it, owe all Christians, and society, an apology for their abomination of the gospel.

There are two words you need to remember when discussing female equality:

Complementarian: the religious belief and lifestyle that women are of equal worth, but must submit to all men at all times, in church and in their own home. It is also called patriarchy.

Egalitarian: the religious belief and lifestyle that women are equal – no buts. This is the belief that I subscribe to – there are no buts!

http://www.shirleytaylor.net

Books: Raising the Hood: A Christian Look at Manhood and Womanhood; Dethroning Male Headship; Women Equal – No Buts: Powered by the same Source; The Power of a Book: The Street Evangelist. Available on Amazon in print or kindle. http://www.amazon.com/author/taylorshirley

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment